Compare phones
Samsung SCH-A790
SCH-A795, SPH-A790, IP-A790Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 30 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 3.40 x 2.00 x 1.00 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| GSM and CDMA | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 141 hours standby time 2.9 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung SCH-A790 is much better than Nokia 1661, getting a 30 score against 27.3. Samsung SCH-A790's design is much heavier and much thicker than the Nokia 1661. Nokia 1661 features a CPU that's very similar to Samsung SCH-A790's CPU, both have the same number of cores. The Nokia 1661 counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung SCH-A790, although it has a way worse resolution of 160 x 128px.
Samsung SCH-A790 features a way better camera than Nokia 1661. The Samsung SCH-A790 has a superior storage for games and applications than Nokia 1661. Nokia 1661 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung SCH-A790.
The Samsung SCH-A790 and the Nokia 1661 cost the same, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.