Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 32 | 35.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-03-27 |
| 3.60 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches | 4.15 x 1.79 x 0.63 inches |
| 3.98 ounces | 3.80 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 120.00 |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 6.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 4.51 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 910mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 370 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola ROKR Z6m is slightly better than Samsung SCH-A930, with a overall score of 35.1 against 32. The Motorola ROKR Z6m is a a little lighter and a lot thinner device than the Samsung SCH-A930. Samsung SCH-A930 and Motorola ROKR Z6m count with extremely similar CPUs, both of them have 0 cpu cores.
The Motorola ROKR Z6m counts with a lot better screen than Samsung SCH-A930, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240. Motorola ROKR Z6m takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung SCH-A930, because it has a camera with lot more megapixels. Samsung SCH-A930 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola ROKR Z6m, although it has no slot for SD memory cards.
The Samsung SCH-A930 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola ROKR Z6m, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola ROKR Z6m is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.