Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234.1
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
2005-03-142009-05-18
3.70 x 1.84 x 1.00 inches4.31 x 1.85 x 0.57 inches
5.70 ounces3.09 ounces
$ 380.00$ 199.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.3
processor processor
--32 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slot
00.84
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.844.73
CDMAUMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
330 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
396 hours standby time
7.4 hours talk time
1.362.64
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 2730 classic US has an overall score of 34.1, which is slightly better than Samsung SCH-A970's 31.2 overall score. The Nokia 2730 classic US is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also extremely thinner and notably lighter than Samsung SCH-A970. Nokia 2730 classic US counts with a way better screen than Samsung SCH-A970, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution.

The Nokia 2730 classic US has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung SCH-A970. Nokia 2730 classic US and Samsung SCH-A970 feature extremely similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit. Nokia 2730 classic US counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung SCH-A970.

The Samsung SCH-A970 features a bit better camera than Nokia 2730 classic US. They have the same resolution back facing camera.

The Nokia 2730 classic US not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.