Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234.2
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
2005-03-142008-04-22
3.70 x 1.84 x 1.00 inches4.25 x 1.71 x 0.41 inches
5.70 ounces2.75 ounces
$ 380.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
00.4
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
4.844.73
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
330 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
406 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
1.362.64
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is slightly better than the Samsung SCH-A970, having a global score of 34.2 against 31.2. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic's construction is way newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than Samsung SCH-A970. The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic's processor is very similar to the processor in Samsung SCH-A970, they have the same number of cores.

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic features a much better looking display than Samsung SCH-A970, because it has a better 320 x 240 pixels resolution. Samsung SCH-A970 captures a bit better photos and videos than Nokia 5220 XpressMusic. Both of them have a 2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera. The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung SCH-A970, although it has no external memory card slot.

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung SCH-A970.

In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.