Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234.1
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
2005-03-142008-04-28
3.70 x 1.84 x 1.00 inches3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches
5.70 ounces3.88 ounces
$ 380.00$ 339.00
Display / Screen
--2.1 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTOLED
--190 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.5
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--15,36 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
00.3
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.845.17
CDMAUMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
330 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
1.362.32
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

The Nokia 6600 fold has a global score of 34.1, which is slightly better than the Samsung SCH-A970's 31.2 score. The Nokia 6600 fold body is notably newer, extremely thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung SCH-A970. Nokia 6600 fold counts with a CPU that's just as good as Samsung SCH-A970's processor, they have 0 cores.

Nokia 6600 fold features a lot better display than Samsung SCH-A970, because it has a better 320 x 240 resolution. The Nokia 6600 fold has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung SCH-A970, although it has no SD card slot. Nokia 6600 fold has a way better battery performance than Samsung SCH-A970.

The Nokia 6600 fold features a little bit better camera than Samsung SCH-A970. Both have a same resolution camera in the back.

The Nokia 6600 fold not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.