Compare phones
Sharp FX
STX-2
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 28.8 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sharp |
| -- | 2010-07-19 |
| 3.46 x 1.76 x 0.78 inches | 4.20 x 2.20 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.80 ounces | 5.00 ounces |
| $ 170.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 3 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 240 x 400 pixels |
| CSTN | TFT |
| 91 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Yes |
| 5 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.82 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1240mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Digital TV Broadcast |
Comparison review
Sharp FX is a bit better than Samsung SGH-A137, having a global score of 31.7 against 28.8. Sharp FX's body is notably heavier but extremely thinner than Samsung SGH-A137. Samsung SGH-A137 and Sharp FX have similar CPUs, both of them have a 0-Core processor. The Sharp FX features a much better looking display than Samsung SGH-A137, because it has a lot greater display density, a really larger screen and a much better 400 x 240px resolution.
Sharp FX features much more memory to install applications and games than Samsung SGH-A137, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 32 GB. The Sharp FX has a superior battery performance than Samsung SGH-A137, because it has a 59 percent more battery size. Sharp FX shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung SGH-A137.
Sharp FX not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.