Compare phones
HP iPAQ 600
600, 614, 614c| Global Score | |
| 34.1 | 36 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HP |
| -- | Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 |
| 2008-09-02 | 2007-09-05 |
| 3.74 x 1.89 x 0.63 inches | 4.60 x 2.37 x 0.68 inches |
| 2.90 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| $ 50.00 | $ 49.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 93 pixels per inch | 143 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 5.1 | 5.8 |
| processor | Marvell PXA270 (Single-Core 520 MHz) processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.66 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 3.00 MP |
| -- | 220 x 176 video resolution |
| 3.63 | 5.06 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 3.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1590mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
HP iPAQ 600 has a score of 36, which is just a bit better than the Samsung SGH-A237's overall score of 34.1. HP iPAQ 600's body is older, just a little thicker and incredibly heavier than the Samsung SGH-A237. The HP iPAQ 600 has a more vivid screen than Samsung SGH-A237, because it has a way better 320 x 240 resolution and a lot greater amount of pixels per display inch.
The HP iPAQ 600's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as Samsung SGH-A237's one. HP iPAQ 600 features a better processing unit than Samsung SGH-A237, because it has a greater number of faster cores. The HP iPAQ 600 features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung SGH-A237, because it has a 1590mAh battery size.
HP iPAQ 600 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung SGH-A237, because it has a back camera with much more megapixels.
The HP iPAQ 600 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung SGH-A237.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.