Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
34.936.1
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--0000-00-00
3.74 x 1.89 x 0.63 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
2.86 ounces3.14 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.56.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
Storage
3,07 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.10
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
3.633.63
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.42.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

Samsung Chrono is just a bit better than Samsung SGH-A437, with a 36.1 score against 34.9. The Samsung Chrono is a just a little thicker and a bit heavier device than Samsung SGH-A437. Samsung Chrono features a bit faster CPU than Samsung SGH-A437, and although they both have 0 CPU cores, the Samsung Chrono also has an additional graphics processing unit.

The Samsung Chrono has a more vivid screen than Samsung SGH-A437, because it has a way better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung SGH-A437 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Chrono.

Samsung SGH-A437 features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Chrono, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh. Samsung Chrono's camera is just as good as Samsung SGH-A437's camera, both have a same resolution camera in the back.

Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Chrono is also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.