Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.834.9
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--2014-02-24
4.53 x 2.05 x 0.77 inches4.58 x 1.98 x 0.52 inches
4.34 ounces2.95 ounces
--Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow
$ 200.00$ 145.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
128 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.66
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
131,07 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.61.32
Camera
--2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--0.2 inches (1/5") sensor
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
05.72
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMGPRS and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
0.90.2
Battery Life
1420mAh Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
252 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
696 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
3.22.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 3.0
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 220 is just a bit better than Samsung SGH-A657, getting a 34.9 score against 31.8. Nokia 220 is a a lot thinner and incredibly lighter device than Samsung SGH-A657. Nokia 220 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung SGH-A657, because it has a better 320 x 240px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.

Nokia 220 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung SGH-A657. Nokia 220's processor is very similar to the Samsung SGH-A657 one, both of them have 0 cpu cores. The Nokia 220 counts with a greater camera than Samsung SGH-A657. Samsung SGH-A657 counts with longer battery duration than Nokia 220, because it has a 1420mAh battery size instead of 1100mAh.

The Nokia 220 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.