Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 30.1 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Symbian | -- |
| -- | 2007-10-11 |
| 3.50 x 1.93 x 0.91 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| 176 x 208 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| SD, MMC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.48 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung SGH-D700 is a little bit better than Motorola W175, having a 30.1 score against 28.6. Samsung SGH-D700's body is noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than the Motorola W175. Motorola W175 has a processing unit that is very similar to Samsung SGH-D700's CPU, they have 0 CPU cores. The Motorola W175 counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung SGH-D700, although it has a way worse 128 x 128 resolution.
The Samsung SGH-D700 takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola W175. The Motorola W175 has as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Samsung SGH-D700, although the Motorola W175 has no external SD slot. Motorola W175 features superior battery performance than Samsung SGH-D700, because it has a 940mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung SGH-D700 and the Motorola W175 cost the same, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.