Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 30.4 | 31 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-03 |
| 3.42 x 1.80 x 0.88 inches | 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches |
| 2.78 ounces | 2.32 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 85.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 73 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 320 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2630 is a little bit better than Samsung SGH-E360, with a 31 score against 30.4. The Nokia 2630 construction is extremely thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung SGH-E360. The Samsung SGH-E360 and the Nokia 2630 count with really similar CPUs, both of them have 0 cores. The Nokia 2630 has a lot better display than Samsung SGH-E360. Both of them have an equal 160 x 128 resolution.
Nokia 2630 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung SGH-E360. Nokia 2630's camera is just as good as Samsung SGH-E360's camera, both have a 0.3 MP back facing camera. The Samsung SGH-E360 has a bit better battery life than Nokia 2630, because it has an 800mAh battery size instead of 700mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Nokia 2630 is also cheaper than the Samsung SGH-E360.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.