Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 30.4 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-04-02 |
| 3.42 x 1.80 x 0.88 inches | 3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches |
| 2.78 ounces | 3.33 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 79.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 video resolution |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 419 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2680 slide has an overall score of 31.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung SGH-E360's global score of 30.4. Nokia 2680 slide is a incredibly thinner but heavier cellphone than Samsung SGH-E360. Nokia 2680 slide features a processor that is just as good as the Samsung SGH-E360 one, both have 0 CPU cores.
Nokia 2680 slide has a way better display than Samsung SGH-E360. Both of them have exactly the same 160 x 128 resolution. Nokia 2680 slide features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Samsung SGH-E360, both have a 0.3 megapixels camera. The Nokia 2680 slide counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung SGH-E360.
The Nokia 2680 slide counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has an 860mAh battery capacity instead of 800mAh.
Nokia 2680 slide not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung SGH-E360.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.