Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.464.8
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--Android 9.0 Pie
--2019-06-10
3.42 x 1.80 x 0.88 inches6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches
2.78 ounces5.50 ounces
--Black
--Metal and Plastic
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--5.5 inches
128 x 160 pixels 1440 x 720 pixels
TFTIPS LCD
--293 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
37.3
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset
processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
--2 GB RAM
GPUAdreno 504 GPU
5.768.73
Storage
--32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
08.12
Camera
0.30 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
3.638.47
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
EDGE and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
SIMNano SIM
0.36.1
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery2990mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
200 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
--
2.244.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 5.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 3.1 A is a lot better than Samsung SGH-E360, getting a global score of 64.8 against 30.4. The Nokia 3.1 A is a much heavier but incredibly thinner cellphone than the Samsung SGH-E360. The Nokia 3.1 A features a way better display than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has a way better 720 x 1440 resolution.

Nokia 3.1 A has a very superior processing power than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has more CPU cores. Nokia 3.1 A counts with a way better camera than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has a much higher 8 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. The Nokia 3.1 A features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.

The Nokia 3.1 A features a superior battery performance than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity.

Nokia 3.1 A costs the same than Samsung SGH-E360, which makes this phone a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.