Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.460.4
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--Android 4.2
--2014-03-15
3.42 x 1.80 x 0.88 inches5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches
2.78 ounces4.90 ounces
--Black and White
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--4.5 inches
128 x 160 pixels 540 x 960 pixels
TFTTFT
--245 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
37.8
processor Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.768.1
Storage
--8 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
04.62
Camera
0.30 MP5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
3.635.94
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
EDGE and GSMHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMMicro SIM
0.34.6
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
--
2.244
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 4.0, EDR
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy S3 Slim has a general score of 60.4, which is way better than the Samsung SGH-E360's score of 30.4. Galaxy S3 Slim's body is incredibly thinner but a lot heavier than the Samsung SGH-E360. The Galaxy S3 Slim features a much faster processor than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster).

Galaxy S3 Slim features a much more vibrant display than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has a much better 960 x 540px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB.

Galaxy S3 Slim features a much better battery life than Samsung SGH-E360, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity.

Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim and the Samsung SGH-E360 cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.