Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 30.3 | 34.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-06-27 |
| 3.22 x 1.65 x 0.94 inches | 3.86 x 1.89 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.00 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| $ 55.00 | $ 55.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 160 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 6.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 3.63 | 5.5 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 350 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 5.4 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 7610 Supernova has a general score of 34.5, which is better than the Samsung SGH-E600's overall score of 30.3. Nokia 7610 Supernova is a noticeably thinner but somewhat heavier device than Samsung SGH-E600. The Nokia 7610 Supernova's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung SGH-E600, both of them have 0 processing cores.
Nokia 7610 Supernova features a much better display than Samsung SGH-E600, because it has a lot higher resolution of 320 x 240px. The Nokia 7610 Supernova features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung SGH-E600. The Nokia 7610 Supernova features a much better camera than Samsung SGH-E600, because it has a back camera with a much better 3.2 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung SGH-E600 features a bit superior battery performance than Nokia 7610 Supernova, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Nokia 7610 Supernova costs exactly the same than Samsung SGH-E600, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.