Global Score | |
35.7 | 36 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | HP |
-- | Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 |
2008-02-11 | 2007-09-05 |
3.91 x 1.88 x 0.58 inches | 4.60 x 2.37 x 0.68 inches |
3.24 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
$ 50.00 | $ 49.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2 inches | 2.8 inches |
128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | TFT |
102 pixels per inch | 143 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | Resistive |
5.2 | 5.8 |
processor | Marvell PXA270 (Single-Core 520 MHz) processor |
-- | 128 MB RAM |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 6.66 |
Storage | |
10,24 MB internal memory | -- |
microSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
0.2 | 0 |
Camera | |
1.30 MP | 3.00 MP |
-- | 220 x 176 video resolution |
4.51 | 5.06 |
Networks | |
-- | Wi-Fi |
EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.3 | 3.3 |
Battery Life | |
800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1590mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
2.24 | 3.44 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
-- | GPS |
FM Radio | -- |
HP iPAQ 600 is a bit better than Samsung SGH-J700, with a global score of 36 against 35.7. Even being the best in this review, the HP iPAQ 600 is a thicker and extremely heavier device than Samsung SGH-J700. The HP iPAQ 600 features a faster CPU than Samsung SGH-J700, because it has a higher number of cores.
HP iPAQ 600 counts with a much better display than Samsung SGH-J700, because it has a much larger screen, a lot better 320 x 240 resolution and a higher display pixels density. HP iPAQ 600 counts with a superior camera than Samsung SGH-J700, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Samsung SGH-J700 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HP iPAQ 600, although it has no SD card slot. The HP iPAQ 600 features a way better battery life than Samsung SGH-J700, because it has 1590mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh.
The HP iPAQ 600 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung SGH-J700, making it a simple decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.