Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 31.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 3.95 x 1.70 x 0.80 inches | 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.54 inches |
| 2.93 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 64 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 0 | 3.74 |
| GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 770mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 90 hours standby time 2.3 hours talk time | 540 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2330 classic has an overall score of 31.8, which is a lot better than the Samsung SGH-N625's 25.5 general score. Nokia 2330 classic's body is a little heavier but a lot thinner than Samsung SGH-N625. The Nokia 2330 classic has a CPU that's very similar to the processing unit in Samsung SGH-N625, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.
The Nokia 2330 classic has a much sharper display than Samsung SGH-N625, because it has a lot higher resolution of 160 x 128 pixels. Nokia 2330 classic has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung SGH-N625. The Nokia 2330 classic features a lot better camera than Samsung SGH-N625.
The Nokia 2330 classic has superior battery life than Samsung SGH-N625, because it has 1020mAh of battery capacity instead of 770mAh.
Nokia 2330 classic costs exactly the same than Samsung SGH-N625, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.