Compare phones
Samsung SGH-R225
SGH-R225M| Global Score | |
| 25.7 | 31.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.33 x 1.81 x 0.93 inches | 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.54 inches |
| 3.35 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 64 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 0 | 3.74 |
| GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 540 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2330 classic has a global score of 31.8, which is much better than the Samsung SGH-R225's global score of 25.7. The Nokia 2330 classic is a a little lighter and incredibly thinner device than the Samsung SGH-R225. Nokia 2330 classic and Samsung SGH-R225 have really similar CPUs, both have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 2330 classic counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung SGH-R225, because it has a much higher 160 x 128 resolution. The Nokia 2330 classic has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung SGH-R225. Nokia 2330 classic features better battery duration than Samsung SGH-R225, because it has a 1020mAh battery size.
The Nokia 2330 classic shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung SGH-R225.
The Nokia 2330 classic costs exactly the same than Samsung SGH-R225.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.