Search


Compare phones

LG Vu

CU920, CU915
Global Score
33.236.5
Basic Information
SamsungLG
--2008-04-01
3.74 x 1.89 x 0.72 inches4.25 x 2.16 x 0.51 inches
2.98 ounces3.16 ounces
$ 135.00$ 120.00
Display / Screen
--3 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
60 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
4.55.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory122,88 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.20.6
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
--320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution
3.634.84
GPRS and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.9
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 1.2
--Digital TV Broadcast

Comparison review

The LG Vu has a score of 36.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung SGH-T139's general score of 33.2. The LG Vu is a incredibly thinner but a little bit heavier cellphone than Samsung SGH-T139. The LG Vu has a CPU that is just as good as the Samsung SGH-T139 one, they have the same number of cores.

The LG Vu counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung SGH-T139, because it has a much higher count of pixels per display inch and a lot higher 400 x 240 resolution. LG Vu counts with a very superior camera than Samsung SGH-T139, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.

LG Vu counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung SGH-T139, because it has 112,64 MB more internal storage. LG Vu has superior battery performance than Samsung SGH-T139, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.

The LG Vu not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.