Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.536.8
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
2007-01-072009-08-06
3.30 x 1.70 x 0.94 inches3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches
2.80 ounces3.50 ounces
$ 250.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.6 inches
128 x 160 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.35.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.30
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.73
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
2.5 hours talk time
6 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0
--GPS

Comparison review

Samsung Reclaim is slightly better than Samsung SGH-T329, getting a 36.8 score against 33.5. The Samsung Reclaim construction is a lot newer and incredibly thinner than Samsung SGH-T329's, although it's also much heavier. Samsung Reclaim has a much better display than Samsung SGH-T329, because it has a way higher 240 x 320 resolution, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a really larger display.

Samsung SGH-T329 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Reclaim, although it has no SD extension slot. Samsung Reclaim's processor is very similar to the processor in Samsung SGH-T329, they have a 0-Core processor. The Samsung Reclaim counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung SGH-T329, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.

Samsung Reclaim takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung SGH-T329, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better 2 megapixels resolution.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Reclaim is also very cheap compared to the other phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.