Global Score | |
37.7 | 41.4 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Nokia |
-- | Symbian 9.3 |
2008-06-23 | 2009-05-06 |
3.62 x 1.83 x 0.78 inches | 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches |
3.30 ounces | 3.46 ounces |
$ 220.00 | $ 190.00 |
Display / Screen | |
-- | 2.4 inches |
176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | TFT |
141 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | No touch screen |
5.7 | 6.4 |
processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 6.75 |
Storage | |
20,48 MB internal memory | 61,44 MB internal memory |
microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
0.3 | 1.5 |
Camera | |
1.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
-- | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
4.51 | 5.5 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
2.7 | 3.5 |
Battery Life | |
880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
264 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 672 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
2.4 | 3.28 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
-- | GPS |
-- | Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor |
The Nokia E52 is a little bit better than the Samsung SGH-T339, having a overall score of 41.4 against 37.7. Nokia E52's design is newer and way thinner, but a little heavier than Samsung SGH-T339. Nokia E52 has a sharper display than Samsung SGH-T339, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution and a little higher pixel number per inch in the screen.
The Nokia E52 features a superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung SGH-T339, because it has 61,44 MB internal storage capacity. The Nokia E52 features a better performing CPU than Samsung SGH-T339, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster). Nokia E52 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung SGH-T339, because it has a back camera with a way better 3.2 mega pixels resolution.
Nokia E52 features a very superior battery life than Samsung SGH-T339, because it has a 70 percent larger battery capacity.
The Nokia E52 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.