Compare phones
Samsung SGH-T509
SGH-T509sSamsung Factor
M260| Global Score | |
| 32.2 | 35.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | 2011-03-09 |
| 4.60 x 1.80 x 0.40 inches | 3.80 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches |
| 2.70 ounces | 3.20 ounces |
| -- | Gray |
| $ 150.00 | $ 79.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 7,17 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
Comparison review
The Samsung Factor is a little bit better than the Samsung SGH-T509, having a global score of 35.2 against 32.2. Samsung Factor is a extremely thicker and heavier device than Samsung SGH-T509. Samsung Factor counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung SGH-T509, although it has a way worse 160 x 128 pixels resolution.
The Samsung SGH-T509 features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Factor. Samsung Factor has a processing unit that's just as good as the Samsung SGH-T509 one, both have 0 CPU cores. The Samsung Factor counts with a battery duration that is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung SGH-T509.
The Samsung Factor features a camera that is just as good as Samsung SGH-T509's camera, they have a same resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Factor is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.