Search


Compare phones

Global Score
37.639
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--Symbian 9.4
--2010-08-24
4.06 x 1.93 x 0.58 inches4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches
3.28 ounces3.77 ounces
--Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White
$ 59.00$ 59.00
Display / Screen
--2.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)360 x 640 pixels
TFTTFT
125 pixels per inch262 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.67.2
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
81,92 MB internal memory52,22 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.51.4
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.735.28
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.90.3
Battery Life
880mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
2.42.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Nokia 5250 has a score of 39, which is slightly better than Samsung SGH-T659's 37.6 general score. Nokia 5250 is a just a bit thinner but somewhat heavier cellphone than the Samsung SGH-T659. The Nokia 5250 counts with a way better display than Samsung SGH-T659, because it has a lot more pixels per display inch and a way better 640 x 360 pixels resolution.

The Nokia 5250 counts with a quite better performance than Samsung SGH-T659, because it has more processing cores. Nokia 5250 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung SGH-T659, although it has just 52,22 MB internal storage. Nokia 5250 captures better photos and videos than Samsung SGH-T659. Both have a same resolution camera.

Nokia 5250 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung SGH-T659, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity instead of 880mAh.

Nokia 5250 costs exactly the same than the Samsung SGH-T659.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.