Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.935
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
2005-03-102008-02-05
3.50 x 1.77 x 0.94 inches4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches
3.13 ounces2.99 ounces
$ 400.00$ 199.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.6
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
81,92 MB internal memory24,58 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD (up to 4 GB) external memory slot
0.50.86
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.515.17
GPRS and GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.4
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
220 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0

Comparison review

Nokia 3120 classic has an overall score of 35, which is a bit better than the Samsung SGH-X800's 31.9 global score. The Nokia 3120 classic is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also a little bit lighter and way thinner than the Samsung SGH-X800. Nokia 3120 classic has a much more vibrant display than Samsung SGH-X800, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution.

The Samsung SGH-X800 and the Nokia 3120 classic count with extremely similar processors, both of them have 0 processing cores. The Nokia 3120 classic features a better camera than Samsung SGH-X800, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera. Nokia 3120 classic counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung SGH-X800, although it has less internal memory.

The Nokia 3120 classic has superior battery lifetime than Samsung SGH-X800, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh.

Nokia 3120 classic is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.