Search


Compare phones

Global Score
38.941.5
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
2010-11-052009-02-09
4.29 x 2.13 x 0.47 inches4.33 x 2.03 x 0.50 inches
3.35 ounces4.16 ounces
Black--
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 100.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
3 inches2.8 inches
240 x 400 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
TFTAMOLED
155 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
YesCapacitive
5.86.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
262,14 MB internal memory81,92 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.80.5
Camera
2.00 MP8.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.736.6
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
10.9
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery880mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.562.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung UltraTouch is just a bit better than the Samsung Solstice II, with a general score of 41.5 against 38.9. The Samsung UltraTouch is an older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Samsung Solstice II. Samsung UltraTouch's CPU is just as good as Samsung Solstice II's CPU, they have the same number of cores.

Samsung UltraTouch has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Solstice II, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 400 x 240px resolution, the Samsung UltraTouch also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. Samsung Solstice II has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung UltraTouch, because it has 262,14 MB internal storage.

The Samsung UltraTouch counts with a much better camera than Samsung Solstice II, because it has a way more MP back facing camera. Samsung Solstice II has a little longer battery life than Samsung UltraTouch, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.

The Samsung UltraTouch is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.