Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.3 | 27.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-03-22 |
| 3.46 x 1.96 x 0.92 inches | 4.23 x 1.78 x 0.87 inches |
| 3.60 ounces | 3.38 ounces |
| $ 130.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.9 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 780mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 216 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | 168 hours standby time 2.4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.24 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3205 has a global score of 27.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung SPH-A500's 25.3 overall score. The Nokia 3205 body is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung SPH-A500. Nokia 3205's CPU is just as good as the processor in Samsung SPH-A500, both have 0 cpu cores. The Samsung SPH-A500 counts with a bit sharper display than Nokia 3205, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 160 x 128.
Nokia 3205 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung SPH-A500. Samsung SPH-A500 and Nokia 3205 both count with similar storage capacity to store more games and applications. Nokia 3205 counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung SPH-A500.
Nokia 3205 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.