Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 27.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2004-11-02 |
| 3.50 x 1.80 x 1.00 inches | 4.17 x 1.73 x 0.79 inches |
| 3.58 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 3,58 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 216 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 330 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.16 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 6020 is just a bit better than the Samsung SPH-A560, with a 27.7 score against 25.5. The Nokia 6020 is a somewhat lighter and extremely thinner phone than Samsung SPH-A560. The Nokia 6020's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung SPH-A560, they have the same number of cores. The Samsung SPH-A560 and the Nokia 6020 have incredibly similar displays, although the Nokia 6020 has a little lower resolution of 128 x 128.
Nokia 6020 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-A560. Nokia 6020 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung SPH-A560. Nokia 6020 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung SPH-A560.
Nokia 6020 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.