Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2004-07-20 |
| 3.50 x 1.80 x 1.00 inches | 5.24 x 2.04 x 1.02 inches |
| 3.58 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 2.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 6,14 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | UMTS, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 216 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6651 has a global score of 27.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung SPH-A560's general score of 25.5. The Nokia 6651 is a just a bit thicker and notably heavier device than the Samsung SPH-A560. Nokia 6651's CPU is very similar to Samsung SPH-A560's processing unit, they have the same number of cores.
The Samsung SPH-A560 has a little bit better screen than Nokia 6651. They have the same 160 x 128 resolution. The Nokia 6651 has a lot better camera than Samsung SPH-A560. Nokia 6651 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung SPH-A560. Nokia 6651 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-A560.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Nokia 6651 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.