Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A660
VI660| Global Score | |
| 25.4 | 27.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Series 30 UI |
| -- | 2013-02-25 |
| 3.30 x 1.80 x 0.87 inches | 4.21 x 1.76 x 0.56 inches |
| 3.54 ounces | 2.47 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| $ 150.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.4 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | LCD |
| -- | 129 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 842 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.24 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 105 is a little bit better than Samsung SPH-A660, with a 27.4 score against 25.4. Nokia 105 is a noticeably thinner and notably lighter phone than Samsung SPH-A660. Nokia 105 counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung SPH-A660, although it has a quite lower 128 x 128 pixels resolution.
The Nokia 105 counts with a processing unit that is very similar to Samsung SPH-A660's processing unit, they have 0 cores. The Nokia 105's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as Samsung SPH-A660's one. The Nokia 105 counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Samsung SPH-A660.
The Nokia 105 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung SPH-A660.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 105 is also the cheapest one, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.