Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A660
VI660| Global Score | |
| 25.4 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 6.1 |
| -- | 2003-10-09 |
| 3.30 x 1.80 x 0.87 inches | 5.10 x 2.24 x 1.00 inches |
| 3.54 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| STN | TFD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | SD, MMC external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 3620 has a score of 27.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung SPH-A660's 25.4 global score. Even being the best in this comparison review, Nokia 3620's body is heavier and thicker than the Samsung SPH-A660. Nokia 3620 has a display that's very similar to the Samsung SPH-A660 one, although the Nokia 3620 also has a higher 208 x 176 resolution.
Nokia 3620 has as much storage capacity to install applications and games as the Samsung SPH-A660. The Nokia 3620's CPU is very similar to Samsung SPH-A660's CPU, both of them have 0 processing cores. The Nokia 3620 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-A660. The Nokia 3620 has a way better camera than Samsung SPH-A660.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 3620 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.