Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A660
VI660| Global Score | |
| 25.4 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2003-11-12 |
| 3.30 x 1.80 x 0.87 inches | 4.06 x 1.69 x 0.79 inches |
| 3.54 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.16 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Compass |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 5140 has a score of 27.5, which is just a bit better than Samsung SPH-A660's 25.4 score. The Nokia 5140 is a a little thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Samsung SPH-A660. Nokia 5140 and Samsung SPH-A660 feature really similar processing units, both of them have a 0-Core processor.
The Samsung SPH-A660 counts with a little bit better screen than Nokia 5140, because it has a bit higher 160 x 128 resolution. The Nokia 5140 takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung SPH-A660. The Samsung SPH-A660 and the Nokia 5140 feature very similar memory capacity to store more games and applications.
The Nokia 5140 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung SPH-A660.
Nokia 5140 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.