Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A660
VI660| Global Score | |
| 25.4 | 27.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2004-11-02 |
| 3.30 x 1.80 x 0.87 inches | 4.17 x 1.73 x 0.79 inches |
| 3.54 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 3,58 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 330 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.16 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 6020 has a score of 27.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung SPH-A660's score of 25.4. The Nokia 6020 construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Samsung SPH-A660. Nokia 6020 has a screen that's just as good as Samsung SPH-A660's display, although the Nokia 6020 has a little bit worse resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
Nokia 6020 and Samsung SPH-A660 feature extremely similar processing units, they have the same number of cores. Nokia 6020 has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-A660. The Nokia 6020 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-A660. The Nokia 6020 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung SPH-A660.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Nokia 6020 is also cheap compared to the Samsung SPH-A660.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.