Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A660
VI660| Global Score | |
| 25.4 | 27.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0 |
| -- | 2003-06-16 |
| 3.30 x 1.80 x 0.87 inches | 4.28 x 2.29 x 0.93 inches |
| 3.54 ounces | 4.40 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 6,14 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | MMC external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 6600 has an overall score of 27.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung SPH-A660's score of 25.4. Although it's the best cellphone in our current comparison, Nokia 6600 is a a bit thicker and heavier cellphone than the Samsung SPH-A660. Nokia 6600 and Samsung SPH-A660 both feature extremely similar displays, although the Nokia 6600 also has a higher 208 x 176 resolution.
Nokia 6600 features a processor that's very similar to the CPU in Samsung SPH-A660, they have 0 processing cores. The Nokia 6600 features a much better camera than Samsung SPH-A660. The Nokia 6600 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung SPH-A660.
Nokia 6600 counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung SPH-A660.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Nokia 6600 is also cheaper than the other phone, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.