Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A660
VI660| Global Score | |
| 25.4 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2004-07-20 |
| 3.30 x 1.80 x 0.87 inches | 5.24 x 2.04 x 1.02 inches |
| 3.54 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 2.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 6,14 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | UMTS, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6651 is a bit better than Samsung SPH-A660, getting a 27.5 score against 25.4. Nokia 6651's design is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung SPH-A660. The Samsung SPH-A660 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 6651. Both have the same 160 x 128 resolution. Nokia 6651 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung SPH-A660.
The Nokia 6651's processing unit is just as good as Samsung SPH-A660's processing unit, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 6651 has a superior battery performance than Samsung SPH-A660. Nokia 6651 captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung SPH-A660.
Nokia 6651 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.