Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A660
VI660| Global Score | |
| 25.4 | 27.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-01-05 |
| 3.30 x 1.80 x 0.87 inches | 4.17 x 1.81 x 0.83 inches |
| 3.54 ounces | 3.53 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 3,58 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6822 is a little bit better than Samsung SPH-A660, getting a 27.6 score against 25.4. Nokia 6822 is a a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner device than the Samsung SPH-A660. The Nokia 6822 counts with a CPU that's very similar to the processing unit in Samsung SPH-A660, both have 0 cpu cores.
Samsung SPH-A660 and Nokia 6822 both count with quite similar screens, although the Nokia 6822 has a little worse resolution of 128 x 128. Nokia 6822 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung SPH-A660. The Nokia 6822 features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung SPH-A660.
Nokia 6822 features a much better battery performance than Samsung SPH-A660.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 6822 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.