Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A700
MM-A700| Global Score | |
| 30.6 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Kyocera |
| -- | 2011-07-25 |
| 3.50 x 2.00 x 0.96 inches | 4.00 x 2.10 x 1.00 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 5.10 ounces |
| $ 105.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 6.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm QSC6085 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 1.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| 4.29 | 5.06 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1360mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 8.1 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 3.12 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Kyocera DuraMax has a global score of 31.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung SPH-A700's global score of 30.6. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, the Kyocera DuraMax body is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Samsung SPH-A700. The Kyocera DuraMax counts with a way better display than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a higher resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.
The Kyocera DuraMax features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 32 GB. Kyocera DuraMax's processing unit is just as good as the Samsung SPH-A700 one, they have the same number of cores. Kyocera DuraMax has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-A700.
Kyocera DuraMax has a better camera than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a way higher resolution camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Kyocera DuraMax is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.