Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A700
MM-A700| Global Score | |
| 30.6 | 32.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-03-27 |
| 3.50 x 2.00 x 0.96 inches | 3.89 x 1.77 x 0.70 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 3.88 ounces |
| $ 105.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 1.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.29 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Motorola W385 is a bit better than Samsung SPH-A700, with a 32.6 score against 30.6. The Motorola W385 is a a bit lighter and way thinner device than the Samsung SPH-A700. Samsung SPH-A700 and Motorola W385 count with really similar CPUs, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit. Motorola W385 has a lot better display than Samsung SPH-A700, although it has a lot worse resolution of 160 x 128px.
The Motorola W385 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-A700. Motorola W385 features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-A700. Samsung SPH-A700 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola W385, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher 1 mega-pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola W385 is also cheaper than the other phone, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.