Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.632.6
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--2012-05-15
3.50 x 2.00 x 0.96 inches4.35 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches
4.20 ounces3.02 ounces
$ 105.00$ 99.00
Display / Screen
--1.8 inches
176 x 220 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTLCD
--114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.15.3
processor processor
--16 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
--10,24 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.52
Camera
1.00 MP0.30 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
4.294.4
CDMAEDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM, Dual SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery1400mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
168 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
839 hours standby time
14 hours talk time
1.363.12
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

The Nokia 112 has a score of 32.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung SPH-A700's 30.6 score. The Nokia 112 construction is incredibly lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung SPH-A700. The Nokia 112 features a much better looking display than Samsung SPH-A700, although it has a lot worse 160 x 128px resolution.

Nokia 112 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 32 GB. The Samsung SPH-A700 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia 112. They have the same number of cores.

Nokia 112 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung SPH-A700. The Nokia 112 features a bit better camera than Samsung SPH-A700, although it has a much less MP back-facing camera.

Even being the best phone in our comparison, Nokia 112 is also cheap compared to the Samsung SPH-A700.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.