Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.633.3
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--2011-06-21
3.50 x 2.00 x 0.96 inches4.06 x 2.02 x 0.67 inches
4.20 ounces4.06 ounces
$ 105.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--2.6 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
--154 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
3.15.8
processor processor
--32 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--10,24 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.52
Camera
1.00 MP2.00 MP
4.294.73
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
168 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
600 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
1.362.64
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia C2-02 is a little bit better than Samsung SPH-A700, with a score of 33.3 against 30.6. Nokia C2-02's body is just a bit lighter and notably thinner than Samsung SPH-A700. The Nokia C2-02 features a processing unit that's very similar to Samsung SPH-A700's processor, both of them have a 0-Core processor.

The Nokia C2-02 counts with a much better display than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240px. Nokia C2-02 has a much better camera than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Nokia C2-02 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 32 GB.

The Nokia C2-02 has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-A700.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia C2-02 is also a bit cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.