Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A700
MM-A700| Global Score | |
| 30.6 | 33.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2011-06-21 |
| 3.50 x 2.00 x 0.96 inches | 4.06 x 2.02 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| $ 105.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.6 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | LCD |
| -- | 154 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 3.1 | 5.8 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 32 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 1.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 4.29 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 600 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia C2-02 is a little bit better than Samsung SPH-A700, with a score of 33.3 against 30.6. Nokia C2-02's body is just a bit lighter and notably thinner than Samsung SPH-A700. The Nokia C2-02 features a processing unit that's very similar to Samsung SPH-A700's processor, both of them have a 0-Core processor.
The Nokia C2-02 counts with a much better display than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240px. Nokia C2-02 has a much better camera than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Nokia C2-02 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 32 GB.
The Nokia C2-02 has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-A700.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia C2-02 is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.