Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A700
MM-A700| Global Score | |
| 30.6 | 33.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2011-06-21 |
| 3.50 x 2.00 x 0.96 inches | 4.06 x 2.02 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| $ 105.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.6 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | LCD |
| -- | 154 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 3.1 | 5.8 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 32 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 1.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 4.29 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 400 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia C2-03 is a little bit better than the Samsung SPH-A700, getting a 33.4 score against 30.6. Nokia C2-03 is a noticeably thinner and a little bit lighter phone than Samsung SPH-A700. Samsung SPH-A700 and Nokia C2-03 both count with similar processing units, they have 0 processing cores. Nokia C2-03 counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.
Nokia C2-03 features a superior camera than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back. Nokia C2-03 has a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 32 GB. Nokia C2-03 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung SPH-A700.
Nokia C2-03 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Samsung SPH-A700.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.