Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 30.6 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.50 x 2.00 x 0.96 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 4.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 3.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 1.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.29 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 168 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a general score of 71.5, which is a lot better than the Samsung SPH-A700's 30.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's design is heavier but much thinner than Samsung SPH-A700. Galaxy S III Cricket has a very superior performance than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a higher number of cores and an extra graphics co-processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a lot better display than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a way higher 1280 x 720 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a much better battery performance than Samsung SPH-A700. The Galaxy S III Cricket takes way better photos and videos than Samsung SPH-A700, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.