Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 33.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Blackberry |
| -- | BlackBerry |
| -- | 2007-10-01 |
| 3.91 x 1.94 x 0.94 inches | 4.20 x 1.95 x 0.55 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 3.40 ounces |
| $ 130.00 | $ 107.00 |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 260 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 136 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.7 |
| processor | Intel XScale (Single-Core 312 MHz) processor |
| -- | 32 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.12 |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 4.73 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4 hours talk time | 216 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
BlackBerry Pearl 8130 is slightly better than the Samsung SPH-A800, having a overall score of 33.9 against 31.2. The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 is a notably lighter and a lot thinner device than Samsung SPH-A800. BlackBerry Pearl 8130 counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung SPH-A800, although it has a little bit worse 260 x 240 resolution.
The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung SPH-A800, because it has a larger number of cores. The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 and Samsung SPH-A800 feature incredibly similar storage capacity to install games and applications, although the BlackBerry Pearl 8130 has no external memory card slot.
BlackBerry Pearl 8130's camera is just as good as the Samsung SPH-A800 one, both of them have a 2 megapixels back camera. BlackBerry Pearl 8130 counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung SPH-A800.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, BlackBerry Pearl 8130 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.