Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 33.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | 2011-05-13 |
| 3.91 x 1.94 x 0.94 inches | 4.20 x 2.30 x 0.60 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 4.00 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| $ 130.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 220 x 176 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 141 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.7 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8,19 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.73 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | -- |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1130mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4 hours talk time | 100 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.8 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Clutch + i475 is a little bit better than the Samsung SPH-A800, getting a 33.7 score against 31.2. The Motorola Clutch + i475 is a incredibly thinner and just a little lighter phone than the Samsung SPH-A800. Motorola Clutch + i475 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung SPH-A800, although it has a way worse resolution of 176 x 220 pixels.
The Motorola Clutch + i475's processor is very similar to the CPU in Samsung SPH-A800, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. The Motorola Clutch + i475 features a much greater memory for apps and games than Samsung SPH-A800, although it has no external SD slot. The Motorola Clutch + i475 features a really longer battery life than Samsung SPH-A800.
The Samsung SPH-A800 has a lot better camera than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a much more MP back camera.
Motorola Clutch + i475 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.