Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 34.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-04-22 |
| 3.91 x 1.94 x 0.94 inches | 4.25 x 1.71 x 0.41 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 2.75 ounces |
| $ 130.00 | $ 79.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | 220 x 176 video resolution |
| 4.73 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4 hours talk time | 406 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 5220 XpressMusic has a general score of 34.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung SPH-A800's general score of 31.2. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is a incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Samsung SPH-A800. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic counts with a much better display than Samsung SPH-A800. They have exactly the same resolution of 320 x 240.
The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung SPH-A800, although it has no slot for an external memory card. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic and Samsung SPH-A800 both have quite similar processing units, both have the same number of cores. The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic has a much longer battery duration than Samsung SPH-A800.
The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic's camera is just as good as Samsung SPH-A800's camera, they have a 2 megapixels back camera.
Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.