Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A800
MM-A800| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 33.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2011-06-21 |
| 3.91 x 1.94 x 0.94 inches | 4.06 x 2.02 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| $ 130.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | LCD |
| -- | 154 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 3.1 | 5.8 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 32 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 4.73 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4 hours talk time | 400 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia C2-03 has a global score of 33.4, which is slightly better than the Samsung SPH-A800's global score of 31.2. Nokia C2-03's design is just a little lighter and extremely thinner than Samsung SPH-A800. Nokia C2-03 has a lot better screen than Samsung SPH-A800. They have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240px.
Nokia C2-03 and Samsung SPH-A800 have quite similar processing units, they have 0 CPU cores. The Nokia C2-03 counts with a camera that's just as good as the Samsung SPH-A800 one, both of them have a camera in the back with a 2 megapixels resolution. The Nokia C2-03 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung SPH-A800.
Nokia C2-03 counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung SPH-A800.
Nokia C2-03 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.