Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--Symbian 9.1
--2006-09-26
3.91 x 1.94 x 0.94 inches3.74 x 2.04 x 0.79 inches
4.30 ounces4.35 ounces
$ 130.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--61,44 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
00.5
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
4.735.5
CDMAUMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
4 hours talk time200 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
1.362.24
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0
GPS--
--Infra-red port
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia N75 has a general score of 34, which is slightly better than Samsung SPH-A800's overall score of 31.2. The Nokia N75 body is just a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than the Samsung SPH-A800. Nokia N75's processor is just as good as the processor in Samsung SPH-A800, both of them have the same number of cores.

The Nokia N75 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung SPH-A800. Both of them have exactly the same resolution of 320 x 240. Nokia N75 features much more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-A800, although it has no SD card slot. Nokia N75 features a very superior battery duration than Samsung SPH-A800.

Nokia N75 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung SPH-A800. Both of them have a 2 mega-pixels resolution camera.

The Nokia N75 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.