Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A800
MM-A800
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 34.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-02-16 |
| 3.91 x 1.94 x 0.94 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 130.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.73 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.24 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung E2210 has a global score of 34.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung SPH-A800's 31.2 global score. The Samsung E2210 body is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung SPH-A800. Samsung SPH-A800 and Samsung E2210 both count with quite similar CPUs, both have 0 cores. The Samsung E2210 has a much sharper screen than Samsung SPH-A800, although it has a lot lower 160 x 128 resolution.
The Samsung E2210 features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung SPH-A800, although it has no external memory card slot. Samsung E2210 features a way better battery performance than Samsung SPH-A800. Samsung SPH-A800 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung E2210, because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung E2210 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.