Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 3.60 x 1.85 x 0.74 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 2.94 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 114 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 0 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 960mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is way better than Samsung SPH-M240, with a general score of 83.3 against 29.6. The Samsung Galaxy S9 body is way heavier but a lot thinner than the Samsung SPH-M240. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung SPH-M240, because it has a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much sharper display than Samsung SPH-M240, because it has a way better pixels density, a lot larger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Galaxy S9 counts with a way better camera than Samsung SPH-M240. The Galaxy S9 has a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-M240, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
The Galaxy S9 features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-M240, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 960mAh.
The Galaxy S9 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Samsung SPH-M240.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.