Compare phones
Sanyo Juno
SCP-2700| Global Score | |
| 29.6 | 31.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sanyo |
| -- | 2009-03-31 |
| 3.60 x 1.85 x 0.74 inches | 4.30 x 2.40 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.94 ounces | 3.40 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Pink |
| $ 160.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 2.2 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 6.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 960mAh Li-Ion Battery | 840mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.5 hours talk time | 4.8 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Sanyo Juno is a bit better than Samsung SPH-M240, getting a 31.5 score against 29.6. Sanyo Juno's body is thinner but somewhat heavier than the Samsung SPH-M240. The Sanyo Juno's processor is just as good as Samsung SPH-M240's CPU, they have a 0-Core CPU. Sanyo Juno features a much better looking display than Samsung SPH-M240, because it has a bigger screen, much more pixels per display inch and a lot better 240 x 320 resolution.
Sanyo Juno takes much better videos and photos than Samsung SPH-M240. The Sanyo Juno's storage capacity for applications and games is just as good as the Samsung SPH-M240 one. Samsung SPH-M240 has a bit longer battery performance than Sanyo Juno, because it has 960mAh of battery capacity instead of 840mAh.
Sanyo Juno not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.