Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 33.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.00 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.3 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 114 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.67 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a lot better than the Samsung SPH-M300, getting a score of 80.7 against 33.5. The Google Pixel 3 XL body is much thinner but noticeably heavier than Samsung SPH-M300. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has way more pixels per display inch and a lot higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung SPH-M300. The Google Pixel 3 XL features an extremely better processing unit than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better camera than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a back camera with a way higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a much longer battery duration than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a 243 percent bigger battery size.
Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.